About ari

ari has been a member since November 16th 2010, and has created 35 posts from scratch.

ari's Bio

ari's Websites

This Author's Website is

ari's Recent Articles

Can Rising Home Prices Signal Another Housing Collapse?

AMA5-18-13Everything old is new again. For many financial analysts and real estate experts, that old saying may explain fears that the stars are aligning for another housing collapse, thanks to current trends in the market that echo all too clearly the signs that led to the last one. Along with the reappearance of a variety of iffy loan products not seen since the last crash, home prices are rising and potential homebuyers are just as unprepared as they were the last time around.

According to a new article posted by The Motley Fool, the recent surge in housing prices sounds a warning bell. The rising home pieces seen in major markets around he country have been welcomed as a sign of economic recovery and new energy in the housing market. But, observers say, high home prices contributed to the previous crash, which saw the market bottoming out and millions of risky borrowers facing foreclosure.

Back then, home prices across the board were rising and sales were booming. But those high prices shut out a substantial number of less affluent potential buyers and left houses unsold. So to keep sales moving, lenders rolled out a smorgasbord of risky new loan options such as low interest, no-interest and even negative amortization mortgages that appeared to make homeownership available to anyone who wanted to buy –even those with below optimal, or subprime credit. Many of these buyers, woefully under informed and poorly prepared, lost their homes when payments ballooned or circumstances changed.

Now, industry observers point out, prices in some markets are approaching levels not seen since before the last crash. Banks are once again beginning to offer some of those risky loan products such as the no-interest mortgage. And the so-called “strategic defaulters” – those who chose to walk away from their mortgage during the crash – re being welcome back by lenders willing o overlook the credit hit those borrowers took the first time around.

And there’s one more factor that completes the deadly combination. Recent surveys on American homebuyer behavior reveal that today, as in the period preceding the last crash, many potential home purchasers are uninformed and unprepared for taking on a mortgage. These would be borrowers don’t know they can shop around for mortgage rates and options and rely on loan officers’ explanations rather than reading the fine print themselves.

When high prices push housing past the affordability threshold for many purchasers, standards drop and lenders begin courting riskier borrowers with problematic loan products and eventually the process collapses on itself. Will lenders learn the lessons of the past? Financial experts point to the behavior of major US banks after the collapse for the answer: a resounding no.

The key to avoiding this scenario, say some financial advisers, lies in the hands of potential borrowers, who need to clearly understand what their options are and what they’re getting into when they take on a long-term mortgage. Taking charge of learning what you need to know is Jason Hartman’s first commandment for investors – wise advice that might keep history from repeating itself.  (Top image: Flickr/rieh)

The American Monetary Association Team

AMA logo

Mixed Messages on the Fed’s Securities Buyup

AMA5-16-13Since it began in the fall of 2012, the Federal Reserve’s large-scale plan to buy up billions of dollars in mortgage backed securities every month to stimulate the housing recovery has waxed and waned, depending on the health of the market. Now, as the program rolls on with no end point in sight, some senior officials at regional Fed banks are saying that it’s time to call it quits.

According to a recent Bloomberg report, the bank presidents of the Dallas, Richmond and Philadelphia regional branches of the Federal Reserve Bank have stated openly that the Fed’s actions to stimulate the housing market could end up having the opposite effect.

The Fed began buying up mortgage securities and Treasury bonds in the fall of 2012 as part of an effort to keep mortgage interest rates low and boost the housing recovery. The buyup, at a rate of over $40 billion a month, had no defined endpoint, with the option of either stepping up or sowing down the rate pf purchases in response to the ebb and flow of the housing market and the economy in general.

In the early months of 2013 representatives of the Fed were reportedly considering scaling back the mortgage securities purchase plan because the housing recovery appeared to be headed for more solid ground. But new fears of a looming housing bubble have kept the program moving full steam ahead, with the option to step up the pace if the market shows signs of slowing down.

The problem, say regional bank officials, relates partly to the sheer scope of the buyup. If housing activity does slump, they say, the Fed could end up holding billions of dollars worth of one kind of commodity with no place to put it. A better plan, in their view, would be to downshift from buying mortgage backed securities and refocus on Treasury bonds for long-term stability. And because the securities plan pushes interest rates artificially low, it may actually be skewing the housing recovery’s natural trajectory.

But even those who advocate abandoning the securities buyup acknowledge that the program can’t be stopped cold turkey – a move that would most likely destabilize the market. A gradual phasing out would allow interest rates to equalize naturally and help to avoid another housing crash. What’s more, they say, the overall economic picture seems to be improving signaling less need for this kind of large-scale intervention.

Regardless of the reservations expressed by some of the Fed’s own representatives, the securities buyout isn’t likely to end anytime soon. But because it plays a major role in keeping the housing market stable, investors following Jason Hartman’s recommendations for building wealth through real estate may want to keep an eye on its ups and downs. (Top image: Flickr/gorfor)

The American Monetary Association Team

Final_AMA_Logo-150x150

AMA 58 – The Quants and Dark Pools with Scott Patterson

Jason Hartman is joined by author, Scott Patterson to discuss high frequency trading, of which roughly 70 percent is driven by computers. Scott says the firms using artificial intelligence for high-speed trading make it nearly impossible for the little guy to compete in the markets. According to his book, Dark Pools, these robot systems trade in milliseconds. High frequency firms flood the market with buy and sell orders, effectively clogging up the system and posing a threat to other firms. For more details, listen at: www.JasonHartman.com. While this electronic exchange made the system more effective, one has to wonder if this trading style hasn’t become detrimental to the markets overall when trading successfully is defined by milliseconds. Scott coined the term “A.I. Bandits” to describe electronic high frequency trading. Scott also discusses the history of quant strategies based on his book, The Quants, a mathematical scientific approach to outsmarting Wall Street, which led to the recent financial crash. He calls the quant system “a classic tale of hubris.”

Scott Patterson is author of The Quants and his new release, Dark Pools, and is currently a reporter for The Wall Street Journal, where he covers financial regulation from Washington, D.C. He has also written for the New York Times, Rolling Stone and Mother Earth News. He has a Masters of Arts degree from James Madison University. He lives in Alexandria, Virginia.

Check out this episode

Applying for Credit Can Damage Your Credit

AMA5-14-13According to the arcane rules of credit scoring, being in debt makes you a better candidate for more debt and paying off your debt hurts your borrowing power. Now another irony of the credit system undermines the efforts of applicants to qualify for mortgages and other types of loans – the simply act of applying may lower a credit score enough to disqualify the borrower from getting the loan.

When the loan process works smoothly, a prospective home buyer applies with a lender and credit scores are checked. If the numbers work out, the loan is approved and the borrower is on the way to buying an investment property or the home of his dreams. But if the application is turned down that means trying again with another lender – or two. Or more. And each new attempt whittles away at the applicant’s credit score a little more.

Here’s why. Every time a prospective borrower asks to be considered for a loan, the lender will run a credit check. Each check constitutes a separate credit inquiry on the credit report. And each of those credit inquiries lowers an individual’s credit score by a few points – which add up quickly over an extended period of loan shopping.

How many points can a credit inquiry cost? That depends on several factors. Though representatives of the Fair Isaac Corp – the FICO that creates the FICO score — say each query deducts on average less than 5 points, some factors on the credit report can cost 5 points or more. These include situations in which a borrower has a very short credit history, with little to offset the deductions or numerous recent delinquencies.

Even a lender’s outdated reporting software can cost points. There’s a window of time around a mortgage application that provides a cushion against multiple credit inquiries. If a borrower makes all mortgage inquiries within a 45-day period, all those applications are treated as one inquiry on the credit report. What’s more, inquiries made in the 30 days prior to the first mortgage application are not included in the tally. If a lender uses older reporting software that allows only the former 14 –day window for multiple mortgage queries, those queries made in the remaining 30 days will register as multiple requests.

Those with higher credit scores most likely won’t feel the bite of a few points for making multiple mortgage applications. . But for those whose scores hover on the edge of “subprime” territory – 630 for FICO and 700 for Vantage, the two leading credit scorers –those points can make a significant difference.

As Jason Hartman says, an investor’s credit score is a precious commodity, and it needs to be treated as one. Good time management during mortgage shopping can keep credit scores healthier and loans likelier.  (Top image:Flickr/SqueakyMarmot)

The American Monetary Association Team

AMA logo

Mortgage Brokering – Another Real Estate Scam?

AMA5-13-13For many mortgage seekers the tried and true route to a loan is through a bank or perhaps a credit union. But faced with an often bewildering array of loan products and interest rates – as well as the potential for being turned down by one or more lenders – potential homebuyers are increasingly turning to third-party assistance – mortgage brokers who find the best loan options –for a fee, of course. And along with other kinds of services and consulting aimed at homebuyers and sellers, mortgage brokerage is ripe for frauds and scams.

What does a mortgage broker do? This individual works with many different lending institutions to find the best rates and loan options for each borrower. That means that in some cases they have access to lenders and loan sources that aren’t available through banks, making it possible for someone who’s been turned down by the bank for credit issues to find an alternative form of funding.

Advocates of mortgage brokerage point out banks operate on only one set of underwriting guidelines and can only offer the bank’s own menu of loan options. There often isn’t much room for flexibility and once a borrower is declined, there are no options except to try another lender, starting the loan process all over again every time.

Credit unions, like banks, offer a range of loan products, often at very attractive rates for their members. But the virtue of credit unions – their small pool of members and in-person service—nay work against a borrower on the bubble. And these institutions may not be work easily with investors who are applying for a mortgage on rental property rather than a personal residence.

Because mortgage brokers have access to far more lenders and loan packages than borrowers can access, a responsible broker may be able to save money. But anyone can claim to be a qualified broker with extensive contacts with multiple loan servicers, charge eager borrowers a hefty upfront fee and vanish without providing any services at all. Although mortgage brokers are frequently former bank loan professionals or real estate agents, there’s no established set of qualifications for the profession. That opens doors for anyone claiming to offer this kind of service.

The housing market is home to a variety of frauds and scams, many of them involving services, advisers and brokers. For investors seeking financing fur income property, it’s wise to keep n mind Jason Hartman’s recommendations to get educated about investing and take the advice of qualified and experienced professionals.(Top image:Flickr/rutio)

The American Monetary Association Team

AMA logo