About derek

derek has been a member since October 26th 2010, and has created 205 posts from scratch.

derek's Bio

derek's Websites

This Author's Website is

derek's Recent Articles

Green Homes Mean Greenbacks

AMA5-25-13Green is still in. More and more businesses large and small are jumping on the bandwagon of environmentally friendly products, services and community planning initiatives. And now, the demand for energy saving features and earth-sensitive practices appears to be providing a not-insignificant boost to the recovering housing market: green homes command not just higher purchase prices, but also higher rents.

Green is the shorthand for a wide range of products, services and strategies that reduce damage to the environment and conserve energy. In the housing industry, opportunities for green building and upgrading can range from land management and building plans for new homes to installing new, energy conserving ductwork in an older home. Landscaping, too, can be a green investment. Planting shade trees to offset heat or xeriscaping to reduce water use also enhance a home’s green appeal.

Whatever the strategy, though, environmental experts and economists agree that green is in – and the desire to at least appear environmentally aware is driving decision making in many areas of the economy. According to Green Real Estate Investing News, that’s especially true in the housing market, where green-certified new homes may sell for 30% more than their standard counterparts in more affluent markets. Existing homes with a few green upgrades like solar paneling or energy-efficient appliances also sell for more.

In the rental market, too, green housing generates interest. Rental housing is in high demand now, fueled by new kinds of renters – affluent professionals and retirees who’ve made a decision not to own a home. These groups, educated and often socially and politically active, may seek out rental housing with environmentally friendly features too.

The benefits of going green aren’t just for new home starts. A variety of companies and even state and federal programs offer incentives and support for home owners seeking to install energy saving devices and make green upgrades in existing homes. These expenditures also qualify as tax-deductible improvements and maintenance.

The financial gains from eco-friendly upgrades ma not be immediate – and for some, the initial outlay can be considerable. But over time, even small changes can pay off in lower utility bills, more efficient use of resources and claimable deductions – as well as a smaller carbon footprint in the world. For income property investors, going green may mean taking the long view for returns on their efforts. But as Jason Hartman says, the long view – buying properties and holding them — is the one that leads to wealth.  (Top image:Flickr/Zalazar)

Read more from The American Monetary Association:

Can Rising Home Prices Signal Another Housing Collapse?

When the Fed’s in the Red, You Pay More

The American Monetary Association Team

AMA logo

 

 

College Degrees: A Waste of Four Years?

AMA5-22-13Is a college degree worth the cost? According to a new survey reported by Forbes, a majority of “millennials” – new and recent college grads – say no. They wish they’d worked and saved instead. And as spiraling student loan debt takes a toll on all sectors of the economy, a growing number of financial experts and educators are starting to agree that in a world of educational options, the traditional four year college model may present more liabilities than benefits.

As we’ve reported in previous posts here, it’s no secret that ballooning student can force debt-ridden graduates to put off many traditional life milestones like buying cars and houses. Some never get there – loan defaults damage their credit so severely that they can’t qualify for these other purchases at all. That’s why, since recent studies reveal that over two thirds of graduates from traditional four year schools finish their college careers in debt, 51 percent of the students surveyed by Forbes said they’d rather work after high school than go to college.

Those responses come at a time when many colleges are also facing drops in enrollment due to rising costs. And they lend new weight to an old argument: in today’s information-driven world, with its fragmentation into millions of niches and sub-niches and opportunities for entrepreneurship. Is the traditional college education really relevant anymore?

Those who say it isn’t point to the fact that a student committing to a major today may find that the field – and the job outlook—will have completely changed by the time graduation rolls around. And there’s no guarantee of finding a lucrative full time job that allows for paying down loans.

Many of today’s most successful individuals have no college education at all – or their college degree has no connection to their successes. And the rise of alternatives to traditional colleges, such as community colleges that offer “starter” degrees with hands on training aimed at employment and online colleges that provide niche-specific training in high-demand fields such as information technology and forensics, allow students to get a more affordable –and relevant – education that gets them into the working world more quickly.

For the entrepreneurially inclined, mentorship and networking take the place of the traditional alumni associations and societies that used to provide channels for job seekers. Qualified professional advice is just a clink away around the clock, too.

Defenders of the traditional four-year college experience say that a degree opens doors to higher paying work and offers students a chance to mature. But those high paying jobs don’t pay out immediately for new grads and are out of reach for many – hence the cliché of the PhD serving burgers at McDonalds. And the burden of student loan debt gobbles up a portion of that income anyway.

The student loan debt problem –and it impact on housing and the economy as a whole –isn’t going away any time soon. What college-age Americans choose to do about it remains to be seen. But for investors following Jason Harman’s guidelines for building wealth in income property, their decisions may change the housing landscape for good. (Top image:Flickr/raiderofgin)

The American Monetary Association Team

AMA logo

Job Growth Changes Bond Buyup Plans

AMA5-20-13In a recent series of intermittent posts on the Federal Reserve’s massive buyup of mortgage backed securities, we’ve been following the plan’s fast forward/slo-mo progress in response to the ebb and flow of activity in various sectors of the economy, particularly housing. Now, just after some regional Fed presidents voiced concerns over the scope of the project and called for its phase-out, Fed officials are considering just that, thanks to encouraging news on the job front.

The encouraging news about the current employment picture comes in the wake of concerns about a slowing housing market. The welfare of both these sectors has acted as a barometer for the Fed’s buyup plans, which explains the project’s erratic trajectory. Since the Fed instituted the securities purchase plan back in September 2012 to boost the housing market, rising home pries and more activity have prompted calls to wind down. But signs of a slowdown in housing have ramped it up again.

But regardless of the need to bolster weak sectors of the economy with artificial intervention, the regional bank officials and others fear that the Reserve will become overburdened with securities holding – that’s over $3 trillion of them now – and that markets will find a natural balance once the Fed stops manipulating the economy.

The improving employment picture affects the plan – and other sectors such as housing – in many ways. Job growth means more purchasing power and gives more people the stability they need to get credit and make big purchases like houses. Expansion in businesses and industry can provide a much-needed boost to neighborhoods in vulnerable areas. A better employment outlook even stimulates the rental market when companies start hiring and attract workers from out of the area.

Federal Reserve Bank officials acknowledge the mixed messages they’re sending about the progress of the plan. These zigzags, they say, demonstrate the project’s flexibility and ability to respond to changes in the economy and selected sectors such as housing. That means that a downturn in employment or a slowdown in housing could push the whole initiative into high gear again.

Even if economic indicators hold steady or improve even more, Fed officials warn that there won’t be an immediate shift in policy. A meeting to discuss the future of the buyup is scheduled for mid-June, and financial analysts don’t expect any appreciable change until at least September – a full year after the buyup project began.

In the meantime, until the Fed decides how many trillions are enough, income property investors following Jason Hartman’s guidelines for successful investing can still find low interest rates and new opportunities in the surging demand for rentals.  (Top image:Flickr/rubio)

The American Monetary Association Team

AMA logo

Can Rising Home Prices Signal Another Housing Collapse?

AMA5-18-13Everything old is new again. For many financial analysts and real estate experts, that old saying may explain fears that the stars are aligning for another housing collapse, thanks to current trends in the market that echo all too clearly the signs that led to the last one. Along with the reappearance of a variety of iffy loan products not seen since the last crash, home prices are rising and potential homebuyers are just as unprepared as they were the last time around.

According to a new article posted by The Motley Fool, the recent surge in housing prices sounds a warning bell. The rising home pieces seen in major markets around he country have been welcomed as a sign of economic recovery and new energy in the housing market. But, observers say, high home prices contributed to the previous crash, which saw the market bottoming out and millions of risky borrowers facing foreclosure.

Back then, home prices across the board were rising and sales were booming. But those high prices shut out a substantial number of less affluent potential buyers and left houses unsold. So to keep sales moving, lenders rolled out a smorgasbord of risky new loan options such as low interest, no-interest and even negative amortization mortgages that appeared to make homeownership available to anyone who wanted to buy –even those with below optimal, or subprime credit. Many of these buyers, woefully under informed and poorly prepared, lost their homes when payments ballooned or circumstances changed.

Now, industry observers point out, prices in some markets are approaching levels not seen since before the last crash. Banks are once again beginning to offer some of those risky loan products such as the no-interest mortgage. And the so-called “strategic defaulters” – those who chose to walk away from their mortgage during the crash – re being welcome back by lenders willing o overlook the credit hit those borrowers took the first time around.

And there’s one more factor that completes the deadly combination. Recent surveys on American homebuyer behavior reveal that today, as in the period preceding the last crash, many potential home purchasers are uninformed and unprepared for taking on a mortgage. These would be borrowers don’t know they can shop around for mortgage rates and options and rely on loan officers’ explanations rather than reading the fine print themselves.

When high prices push housing past the affordability threshold for many purchasers, standards drop and lenders begin courting riskier borrowers with problematic loan products and eventually the process collapses on itself. Will lenders learn the lessons of the past? Financial experts point to the behavior of major US banks after the collapse for the answer: a resounding no.

The key to avoiding this scenario, say some financial advisers, lies in the hands of potential borrowers, who need to clearly understand what their options are and what they’re getting into when they take on a long-term mortgage. Taking charge of learning what you need to know is Jason Hartman’s first commandment for investors – wise advice that might keep history from repeating itself.  (Top image: Flickr/rieh)

The American Monetary Association Team

AMA logo

Mixed Messages on the Fed’s Securities Buyup

AMA5-16-13Since it began in the fall of 2012, the Federal Reserve’s large-scale plan to buy up billions of dollars in mortgage backed securities every month to stimulate the housing recovery has waxed and waned, depending on the health of the market. Now, as the program rolls on with no end point in sight, some senior officials at regional Fed banks are saying that it’s time to call it quits.

According to a recent Bloomberg report, the bank presidents of the Dallas, Richmond and Philadelphia regional branches of the Federal Reserve Bank have stated openly that the Fed’s actions to stimulate the housing market could end up having the opposite effect.

The Fed began buying up mortgage securities and Treasury bonds in the fall of 2012 as part of an effort to keep mortgage interest rates low and boost the housing recovery. The buyup, at a rate of over $40 billion a month, had no defined endpoint, with the option of either stepping up or sowing down the rate pf purchases in response to the ebb and flow of the housing market and the economy in general.

In the early months of 2013 representatives of the Fed were reportedly considering scaling back the mortgage securities purchase plan because the housing recovery appeared to be headed for more solid ground. But new fears of a looming housing bubble have kept the program moving full steam ahead, with the option to step up the pace if the market shows signs of slowing down.

The problem, say regional bank officials, relates partly to the sheer scope of the buyup. If housing activity does slump, they say, the Fed could end up holding billions of dollars worth of one kind of commodity with no place to put it. A better plan, in their view, would be to downshift from buying mortgage backed securities and refocus on Treasury bonds for long-term stability. And because the securities plan pushes interest rates artificially low, it may actually be skewing the housing recovery’s natural trajectory.

But even those who advocate abandoning the securities buyup acknowledge that the program can’t be stopped cold turkey – a move that would most likely destabilize the market. A gradual phasing out would allow interest rates to equalize naturally and help to avoid another housing crash. What’s more, they say, the overall economic picture seems to be improving signaling less need for this kind of large-scale intervention.

Regardless of the reservations expressed by some of the Fed’s own representatives, the securities buyout isn’t likely to end anytime soon. But because it plays a major role in keeping the housing market stable, investors following Jason Hartman’s recommendations for building wealth through real estate may want to keep an eye on its ups and downs. (Top image: Flickr/gorfor)

The American Monetary Association Team

Final_AMA_Logo-150x150