Are Major Banks Choking the Housing Recovery?

AMA5-12-13After the string of lawsuits, settlements and legislative actions related to lax and fraudulent mortgage and foreclosure practices, the nations major lenders are taking a new stand. With stricter lending standards, more transparency and better accountability, these institutions attempt to forestall another mortgage meltdown like the one that created the great housing collapse. But, some sources say, these more responsible practices may be having the unintended result of stalling the recovery of the housing market.

One of the main reasons for the noisy popping of the “housing bubble” back in 2007-2008 was the loosening of lending standards that allowed so many mortgages to be granted to subprime borrowers – those with relatively poor credit and potential problems with repayment/ Many of these borrowers also ended up with adjustable rate mortgages whose terms they poorly understood, so that when payments eventually went up, they had to default.

A number of lawsuits, settlements and government interventions later, the nation’s major lenders have instituted programs to help troubled homeowners with refinancing and payment plans, and instituted tighter borrowing standards and better oversight of the lending process – strategies intended to encourage people to take advantage of the current low interest rates.

But as the Wall Street Journal reports, the Federal Reserve’s new survey of senior loan officers at major banks reveals that these lenders are easing up a little on some loan requirements – but only to those with the best credit scores and payment histories. But those with middle of the road and lower credit scores still face tight scrutiny and more problems qualifying for mortgages. That shuts some would-be homebuyers out of the market, unable to take advantage of the current low interest rates that might make it possible to buy a home at all. And. some financial experts fear, the loss of this pool of potential buyers could drag down the housing recovery.

But not all risky buyers get equal treatment. As we discussed here a few posts ago, many banks are showing a new willingness to work with the “strategic defaulters” – homeowners faced with foreclosure who simply walked away from the mortgage and accepted the resulting blot on their credit. If a borrower’s only credit stain comes from a mortgage default that’s traceable back to the housing crash, some lenders are offering a second chance.

Stricter lending standards and better accountability are helping major banks clean up their images and avoid the consequences of another housing meltdown, but the results for the long term housing recovery may be mixed. For heroic income property investors following Jason Hartman’s recommendations to keep a fixed rate mortgage, it’s worth keeping an eye on the changing policies of these major players in the mortgage business. (Top image:Flickr/rutio)

The American Monetary Association Team

AMA logo

Related Posts

S&P 500 vs. Gold Price

AmericanMonetaryAssociation.orgOne of the important ratios to keep in mind when examining the equity markets is the gold price relative to the major stock market indexes. This provides a valuable insight into the extent to which market values reflect a real shift of sentiment toward equity value, versus the extent to which the value has lost value, driving increases in nominal valuations to simply retain purchasing power. Over the last 35 years, the relative price of Gold1 and the S&P 5002 has oscillated up and down very significantly. In the aftermath of 2008 and the financial crisis, this ratio has regressed toward a value of 1.0, which indicates equal valuation for the S&P 500 index and an ounce of gold. In the latter half of 2010, the S&P 500 vs. Gold ratio dropped below 1.0 as Gold prices were pushed up by speculators seeking to hedge against expected future inflation. Our analysis indicates that this trend is likely to continue through 2011 as monetary expansion inflates both asset classes.

Read More »
×

Loading chat...