More Legal Woes for Bank of America?

AMA5-3-13Will the Bank of America never learn? After a multibillion dollar settlement in the robosigning bank fraud scandal and ongoing court battles related to charges of skewing numbers reported to LIBOR, the bank so many love to hate is in trouble again, facing accusations of bad faith that could jeopardize yet another settlement in yet another fraud case.

Bank of America, which regularly makes the top ten of the most despised institutions in the country, has been a major player in numerous ongoing lawsuits alleging that the bank, and others, committed a variety of fraudulent acts and practices dating back to the housing meltdown of 2008.

BofA was one of 16 major lenders named in a lawsuit filed by state attorneys general regarding the infamous “robosigning” scandal after the housing collapse, when massive numbers of foreclosures were processed with fake signatures and no oversight. In that case, the banks involved agreed to settlement of over $6 billion to bee distributed among the scandal’s victims.

Then, Bank of America, along with other lenders, became the defendant in several lawsuits involving charges that the bank and its co defendants had fraudulently reported data used to calculate LIBOR (London InterBank Offered Rate) rates used to for short term lending worldwide. Narrowly escaping charges of violating antitrust laws, the bank and its fellow defendants still face allegations of fixing the rates.

Now, as the bank continues to fight some of these suits it’s embroiled in a new controversy – that a settlement deal totaling $8.5 billion reached in 2011 between BofA and some of its investors is now in question in light of charges from the plaintiffs that the bank violated terms of the settlement to further its own interests.

According to a new report by The Motley Fool, the current case involves 530 mortgage trusts sold by the now-defunct Countrywide Financial, a corporation purchased by BofA. The plaintiffs in the case – the investors – claim that the Bank of New York Mellon, acting s trustee for the investors, failed to act in good faith, thus calling the entire settlement into question.

If a New York State Supreme Court rules against BNYM’s parent Bank of America on May 30, 2013, some financial experts estimate Bof A’s latest penalty at around $60 billion. That’s in addition to the amount the bank must pay out in the original settlement.

The lawsuits aren’t over for Bank of America. As they roll on, with penalty after penalty assessed against the banking giant, property investors following Jason Hartman’s recommendations for financing income property, one lesson may be that Bank of America never learns its lesson. (Top image: Flickr/VoxEx)

The American Monetary Association Team

AMA logo

Related Posts

S&P 500 vs. Gold Price

AmericanMonetaryAssociation.orgOne of the important ratios to keep in mind when examining the equity markets is the gold price relative to the major stock market indexes. This provides a valuable insight into the extent to which market values reflect a real shift of sentiment toward equity value, versus the extent to which the value has lost value, driving increases in nominal valuations to simply retain purchasing power. Over the last 35 years, the relative price of Gold1 and the S&P 5002 has oscillated up and down very significantly. In the aftermath of 2008 and the financial crisis, this ratio has regressed toward a value of 1.0, which indicates equal valuation for the S&P 500 index and an ounce of gold. In the latter half of 2010, the S&P 500 vs. Gold ratio dropped below 1.0 as Gold prices were pushed up by speculators seeking to hedge against expected future inflation. Our analysis indicates that this trend is likely to continue through 2011 as monetary expansion inflates both asset classes.

Read More »
×

Loading chat...